One register, from framework requirement to signed-off evidence.
Control Tower holds the whole chain of assurance in one place — the CQC framework, the questions an inspector is likely to ask, your practice’s answer to each, the policies and audits that make those answers true, and the evidence that makes them defensible. Every readiness figure traces back to a document and a person.
The chain of assurance, held end to end.
See the whole practice at a glance, then drill to the gap.
The dashboard rolls up the RAG state of every requirement across the five framework domains. It is a working view, not a vanity figure — the headline percentage is only ever the sum of what is actually evidenced, and each amber or red state links straight to the requirement that needs work.
AI that drafts and cites — a person who signs off.
Assist is a verb, not a chatbot. Run it against a question and it drafts an answer from your own register, cites the documents behind it, and hands it to a named reviewer. Nothing reaches your readiness figure until a person has approved it — and that approval is logged to the audit trail.
- Grounded, cited answers — never an unsourced claim
- Human approval logged to the audit trail as an event
- A verb you run, not a persona you chat with
Every document, linked to what it proves.
Audits, policies, certificates and screenshots live in one library. Each item links to the requirements it evidences and carries a freshness date, so when assurance ages past your threshold the register marks it stale — before an inspector does.
- Link one document to many requirements at once
- Freshness dates and automatic stale-evidence flags
- File-type chips and source references in monospace
Author the policies that back your answers — and prove they're current.
Write a policy in a governance editor, or let Assist draft one from your framework scope and review it as tracked changes. A draft stays in-progress — never counted as evidence — until a person has reviewed and adopted it. One policy backs many requirements at once, stays searchable to the register, and prints straight into the inspection pack.
- Draft with Assist, review as tracked changes, adopt when ready
- A draft is in-progress — only an adopted policy counts as evidence
- One policy backs many requirements; print-ready for the pack
Run the audits that turn amber into green.
Build a reusable audit template — or have Assist draft one — and schedule it to recur. Each run scores the share of applicable questions that pass and bands it green, amber or red; N/A and unanswered are left out of the maths. A completed run becomes evidence in its own right, raising coverage on every requirement it touches, and each finding carries an owner, a due date and an overdue flag.
- Reusable templates with scheduled, recurring runs
- Scored on the share of applicable questions that pass, banded to RAG
- A completed run becomes evidence and raises requirement coverage
A second opinion that asks: would this survive inspection?
Inspector review reads a signed-off answer the way a CQC inspector would and pushes back — where the evidence is thin, where an audit proves the process ran once but not that it holds, what follow-up question you'd struggle to answer on the day. It only ever suggests: it raises the challenge and the action, never quietly changes your record.
- Adversarial critique with a RAG verdict and confidence
- Surfaces the follow-up questions before the inspector does
- Suggest-only — every challenge lands with an owner, not a silent edit
The rest of what a governance lead reaches for, in one place.
See it against your own framework scope.
We onboard practices in small cohorts and set the register up against your real requirements. Join the waitlist and we'll be in touch before the next intake.
Join the waitlist